The New York Times is being criticized by many, together with its personal Afghanistan correspondent, after publishing an opinion piece Thursday by the deputy chief of the Taliban, who is needed by the U.S. authorities.
The opinion piece, headlined “What We, the Taliban, Need,” was written by Sirajuddin Haqqani because the Trump administration is hoping to succeed in a peace take care of the Taliban that may finish America’s longest struggle and start the withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan.
The Taliban stated Monday a deal might be signed by the top of February.
“When our representatives started negotiating with the United States in 2018, our confidence that the talks would yield results was close to zero. We did not trust American intentions after 18 years of war and several previous attempts at negotiation that had proved futile,” Haqqani wrote to open the piece. “Nevertheless, we decided to try once more.”
The Taliban chief declared that the “long war has exacted a terrible cost from everyone” and his group felt it could be “unwise to dismiss any potential opportunity for peace,” regardless of what he referred to as “meager” prospects of its success.
“For more than four decades, precious Afghan lives have been lost every day. Everyone has lost somebody they loved. Everyone is tired of war. I am convinced that the killing and the maiming must stop,” Haqqani wrote. “We did not choose our war with the foreign coalition led by the United States. We were forced to defend ourselves.”
Haqqani wrote that the “withdrawal of foreign forces has been our first and foremost demand” and the Taliban standing “at the threshold of a peace agreement with the United States is no small milestone.”
Haqqani accused Individuals of flip-flopping and transferring the goalposts in the case of negotiations, claiming that the group even saved the door open when President Trump referred to as off talks.
“That we stuck with such turbulent talks with the enemy we have fought bitterly for two decades, even as death rained from the sky, testifies to our commitment to ending the hostilities and bringing peace to our country,” Haqqani wrote.
The prolonged column goes on to element Haqqani’s claims, together with that he doesn’t belief the US and that an settlement would permit Afghans to “begin transferring towards lasting peace” and stay with dignity.
New York Occasions senior correspondent in Afghanistan Mujib Mashal blasted his employer on Twitter.
“The piece by Siraj Haqqani in @nytopinion– which’s unbiased of our information operations & judgment – omits probably the most basic reality: that Siraj is not any Taliban peace-maker as he paints himself, that he is behind a few of most ruthless assaults of this struggle with many civilian lives misplaced,” Mashal wrote earlier than sharing hyperlinks to a number of Occasions reviews exhibiting what Haqqani’s group has been accused of through the years.
Based on the FBI’s website, “Haqqani is wanted for questioning in connection with the January 2008 attack on a hotel in Kabul, Afghanistan, that killed six people, including an American citizen. He is believed to have coordinated and participated in cross-border attacks against United States and coalition forces in Afghanistan. Haqqani also allegedly was involved in the planning of the assassination attempt on Afghan President Hamid Karzai in 2008.”
There’s a reward of as much as $5 million for data resulting in his arrest.
The Occasions’ senior correspondent in Afghanistan isn’t the one individual to search out the Occasions column alarming.
“It’s bizarre that the Times would helpfully publish an op-ed by the deputy leader of the Taliban, yet cannot stand the idea of their newspaper reviewing a New York Times best-seller by Mark Levin. In their mind, one of these men is beyond the pale,” Media Analysis Middle’s Tim Graham advised Fox Information.
Others took to Twitter to criticize the Occasions:
Fox Information’ Louis Casiano contributed to this report.