//‘Stunned’ Sen. Collins objected to Nadler’s impeachment accusation in notice to Roberts

‘Stunned’ Sen. Collins objected to Nadler’s impeachment accusation in notice to Roberts

One Home Democrat’s accusation amid the Trump impeachment trial “stunned” even probably the most reasonable of Senate Republicans, reportedly prompting GOP Sen. Susan Collins to jot down a notice to Chief Justice John Roberts about decorum on the ground of the higher chamber.

Collins, R-Maine, is the newest to sign her concerns, after impeachment supervisor Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., asserted earlier this week that GOP senators had been engaged in a “cover-up.”


Collins advised Politico she was “stunned” by Nadler’s feedback, and confirmed to the outlet that she wrote a notice that made its option to Roberts after a tense forwards and backwards between Nadler and White Home Chief Counsel Pat Cipollone.

“It reminded me that if we were in a normal debate in the Senate, that the rule would be invoked to strike the words of the senator for impugning another senator,” she advised Politico. “So, I did write a note raising the issue of whether there’d been a violation of the rules.”

Collins mentioned she gave the notice to the secretary for almost all, Laura Dove, and “shortly thereafter, the chief justice did admonish both sides. And I was glad that he did.”

CNN first reported that Collins wrote a notice for the chief justice.

“I’m going to cast my vote regardless of the congressman’s performance,” she advised Politico. “His negative comments about the Senate will not have any impact.”

Collins is amongst a small group of Republican senators seen as a potential swing vote on impeachment and a potential supporter of permitting extra witness testimony afterward within the trial.

Additionally included in that group is Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, who mentioned this week she was offended by Nadler’s presentation.


“I took it as offensive,” she advised reporters Wednesday. “As one who is listening attentively and working hard to get a fair process, I was offended.”

Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., mentioned Democrats took “a huge step backward” of their opening.

“I mean, that’s an extraordinary thing to say on the floor of the United States Senate, the middle of the trial, and that’s what drew the rebuke and rightly so,” Hawley mentioned. “I can tell you, there was an open, open gasping on the Senate floor when Nadler was saying these things. I mean, It’s really, really extraordinary.”

FILE - In this Nov. 6, 2019, file photo, Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, is surrounded by reporters as she heads to vote at the Capitol in Washington. U.S. Sen. Collins officially launched her bid for a reelection Wednesday, Dec. 18, setting up an expensive and closely watched battle for the seat the moderate Republican from Maine has held for nearly 24 years. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File)

FILE – On this Nov. 6, 2019, file picture, Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, is surrounded by reporters as she heads to vote on the Capitol in Washington. U.S. Sen. Collins formally launched her bid for a reelection Wednesday, Dec. 18, organising an costly and intently watched battle for the seat the reasonable Republican from Maine has held for practically 24 years. (AP Picture/J. Scott Applewhite, File)

Nadler’s opening assertion started by calling Republican assist for the president “embarrassing.”

“The president is on trial in the Senate, but the Senate is on trial in the eyes of the American people,” he mentioned. “Will you vote to allow all the relevant evidence to be presented here? Or will you betray your pledge to be an impartial juror?”

“Will you bring Ambassador [John] Bolton here? Will you permit us to present you with the entire record of the president’s misconduct? Or will you instead choose to be complicit in the president’s cover-up?” he continued. “So far I’m sad to say I see a lot of senators voting for a cover-up, voting to deny witnesses, an absolutely indefensible vote, obviously a treacherous vote.”

The Trump authorized group tried to defend towards Nadler’s remarks, drawing the chief justice to subject a rebuke to either side.

“It’s applicable at this level for me to admonish each the Home managers and the president’s counsel in equal phrases to do not forget that they’re addressing the world’s best deliberative physique,” Roberts mentioned. “One purpose it has earned that title is as a result of its members keep away from talking in a way, and utilizing language, that’s not conducive to civil discourse. “

Roberts continued: “In the 1905 [Judge Charles] Swayne trial, a senator objected when one of many managers used the phrase ‘pettifogging’ — and the presiding officer mentioned the phrase ought to not have been used. I do not assume we have to aspire to that top a normal, however I do assume these addressing the Senate ought to bear in mind the place they’re.”

In the meantime, senators, typically, have already proven some restlessness on the ground after hours and hours of opening statements from the prosecution.

“The House is completely miscalculating how to handle this,” a Senate GOP supply advised Fox Information Thursday. “They’re putting far too much emphasis on the time they use than the substance of what they’re delivering.”

Fox Information’ Jason Donner, Gregg Re and Marisa Schultz contributed to this report.