The USA At this time is being criticized for publishing an opinion piece on Wednesday arguing it’s “terrifying” that some Texas churchgoers were armed when Jack Wilson jumped into motion and killed a mass shooter earlier than he might shoot anybody else.
Wilson, a firearms teacher who was a volunteer member of the church’s safety staff, has been extensively praised for his life-saving response, however Arizona Republic columnist Elvia Diaz found problems with the state of affairs.
The piece, “Armed, even in church: Texas shooting is about a lot more than Jack Wilson’s heroism,” was printed with the disclaimer that the views are the writer’s and don’t mirror USA At this time’s management.
Diaz referred to as Wilson a hero earlier than claiming “sadly” the “split-second heroism has been turned into a PR tool by gun advocates.”
Two males have been killed when the gunman opened fire at West Freeway Church of Christ in White Settlement on Sunday morning, with greater than 240 parishioners inside. Inside seconds, he was shot to loss of life by two congregants who fired again.
Within the column that was initially printed in AZ Central and distributed by the USA At this time, Diaz wrote that Wilson is “exactly the kind of man you want around with a firearm” however questioned others having his again.
“We know nothing about the at least six other parishioners who also appeared to draw their handgun… and that’s terrifying,” Diaz wrote.
Diaz admitted that Wilson saved lives with a single shot and “other gun-wielding parishioners were ready just in case” he failed, however criticized why the churchgoers have been armed within the first place.
“Have we really reached a point when each of us need to carry a firearm anywhere we go? Gun advocates certainly think so,” Diaz wrote. “Gun advocates didn’t waste any time after the recent church incident to promote the idea of arming oneself.”
The controversial column concluded with Diaz declaring that the taking pictures “isn’t just about Jack Wilson’s heroism,” however how the church shooter obtained a gun within the first place.
Media Analysis Heart analyst Kristine Marsh wrote that “Diaz turned the parishioners who heroically drew their weapons on the shooter into villains” with the op-ed.
“Diaz only would concede that the man who killed the shooter was a ‘hero’ because he met her standards of someone who should own a gun. She immediately lamented how this story had been utilized by the right,” Marsh wrote.
USA At this time didn’t instantly reply to a request for remark.
Some critics have been upset that Diaz used the time period “unfortunately” when referring to Wilson’s heroics, some have been shocked that not figuring out the backgrounds of churchgoers keen to threat their lives to guard others is “terrifying” and others didn’t admire a jab Diaz took at President Trump for praising heroes who saved fellow worshippers.
The mix of things induced the column to go viral and get hit with an onslaught of backlash.
Fox Information’ Travis Fedschun contributed to this report